Does the term “mindset” help navigate the complexities of work culture? Or does mindset trap us in machine metaphors, increasing the ‘ghost in our machine design’?  

We delve into the intricacies of subjective understanding and the limitations of mindset theory. By exploring the concept of fluidity in interpreting reality, we challenge the idea of a single mindset and embrace the complexity of human cognition. 

Through thoughtful dialogue, we examine the interplay between subjective experiences, patterns of understanding, and the notion of free will. 

By embracing a broader perspective, we can navigate the complexities of human consciousness and foster a more nuanced understanding of organizational change.

Challenging the Notion of Mindsets 

Let’s elaborate on their viewpoint in response to a question about rejecting mindsets. 

1. The term “mindset” conjures the image of a single setting, like a TV channel or a prearranged machine operation. However, human cognition is far more complex. Our minds constantly engage with multiple information channels, intentions, and external influences. Attempting to confine our thinking to a fixed set disregards the intricate interplay of various signals and influences.
2. The notion of mindset is often misused to label individuals as having the “wrong” mindset. This implies that a broken switch can be reset through a consultant, coach, or book intervention. However, this reductionist perspective fails to acknowledge the richness and complexity of human consciousness.

Understanding Subjective Interpretation and Patterns 

Subjective understanding and patterns, not mindsets, might be a more useful way to think about work culture. Acknowledging the existence of a subjective way of interpreting reality, recognizing that individuals bring their unique perspectives and biases to the table. 

When considering patterns in subjective understanding, let’s explore the idea cautiously.

1. Drawing from Heraclitus, the experience of a moment is in constant flux. No two moments are alike; we constantly change as groups and individuals. This fluidity challenges the notion of fixed patterns in subjective understanding. 
2. While patterns may emerge, they are transient and influenced by the dynamic nature of human consciousness.

Through subjective understanding, does each person really have free will, and what is free will’s relationship to subjective understanding? 

A thought-provoking piece by Jerry Garfield on the illusion of self questions whether free will exists as a distinct entity detached from the cause and effect of nature. This existential exploration further emphasizes the intricate layers of human cognition and its interconnectedness with the external world.

Navigating the Complexities of Organizational Change

The dialogue surrounding subjective understanding and the rejection of fixed mindsets offers valuable insights for navigating organizational change. 

It emphasizes the need to embrace complexity and fluidity at the group and organizational levels.

Organizations might recognize the interpretations and perspectives individuals and groups bring to learn with change effectively. This requires fostering a culture of open communication and collaboration, where different ideas can be shared and examined. By embracing the fluidity of subjective understanding, organizations can tap into the collective intelligence of teams and foster innovation.

Embracing Fluidity of Change 

In a world where change is obviously constant and sometimes exhausting, it is essential to challenge mindset theory and embrace the fluidity of subjective understanding. The intricacies of human cognition and the limitations of trying to confine it within rigid frameworks bring us back to machine metaphors. We want to believe we have free will, so when we feel a means to a corporate end as a collective, we feel apathetic and can become angry with each other ((interpersonal) as opposed to those who use us as means to their ends. 

Organizational success lies in acknowledging the complexity of subjective interpretation and leveraging collective intelligence. By encouraging collaboration, embracing and listening to perspectives, and recognizing the transient nature of patterns; organizations can navigate change and notice conversations. This requires an open-minded approach that values flexibility, adaptability, and continuous learning.

As we stand in the river of experience, the cause and effect of our actions pulling us downstream, we are reminded of the intricate web of influences shaping our understanding. 

Rather than striving for mindset theory, we can appreciate the beauty and complexity of our evolving perspectives.

By rejecting the idea of mindset, we open ourselves to new possibilities and avenues for growth. We become more attuned to the ever-changing nature of our thoughts and perceptions. 

This awareness allows us to approach organizational change with curiosity and adaptability, understanding that what worked in the past may not be the best solution for the present or future.

As managers, embracing this fluidity within groups and moving within our teams is crucial. 

Here are five strategies that can help us navigate organizational change and look for collective intelligence:

1. Encourage continuous learning and growth within the organization. Emphasize embracing new ideas, challenging assumptions, and seeking others’ perspectives. Create opportunities for people to engage in professional development and acquire new skills.
2. Conversations and Interactions: Let the environment open conversation and interaction. Establish channels for employees to share their thoughts, insights, and concerns. Actively listen to different viewpoints and facilitate constructive discussions that promote understanding and innovation.
3. Look for patterns: Ask for others’ observations and look for interaction and conversation patterns that promote iterative problem-solving and adaptability. Encourage cross-functional teams to work collaboratively, respond quickly to changing circumstances, and experiment with new approaches. Embracing pattern recognition enables organizations to navigate uncertainty more effectively.
4. Use Data and Analytics: Ask for and use the power of data and analytics to be a piece of decision-making. Some data-driven insights will understand customer preferences, identify market trends, and optimize internal processes. By making data a part of your decisions, organizations can see risks and outlier potentials that make emerging opportunities more noticeable.
5. Encourage Experimentation and Safe-to-Fail Efforts: Create a safe environment where people can make safe-to-fail efforts and experiment with new ideas. Develop a process that learns from these efforts and views them as a sense-making step to notice change. Emphasize the importance of oblique efforts and learning from positive and negative experiences.

By implementing some strategies, managers can embrace the fluid nature of subjective understanding and leverage collective intelligence within their organizations. They can work with team change by noticing and reinforcing a culture of growth, open communication, data-informed decision-making, and experimentation.

In conclusion, navigating organizational change requires us to challenge mindset theory and embrace the fluidity of subjective understanding. 

By recognizing the limitations of rigid perspectives, we can tap into the collective intelligence within our organizations and adapt to a rapidly evolving business landscape. As managers, let us embrace the complexities of group cognition, encourage open-mindedness, and create environments that foster innovation and adaptability. In doing so, we can navigate change with resilience and better notice new opportunities for success.

References: 

• Bandura, A. (1986). Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Prentice-Hall.
• Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. Harper Perennial.
• Miller, J. G., & Bersoff, D. N. (1992). Culture and Cognitive Processes: From Arbitration to Accommodation. Psychological Bulletin, 112(3), 369–376. doi:10.1037/0033–2909.112.3.369
• Hargrove, R. (2003). Masterful Coaching: Extraordinary Results by Impacting People and the Way They Think and Work Together. Jossey-Bass.
• Stacey, R. D. (2001). Complex Responsive Processes in Organizations: Learning and Knowledge Creation. Routledge.
• Griffin, D., Shaw, P., & Mowles, C. (2010). The Organization of Leadership. Routledge.
• Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The New Psychology of Success. Random House.
• Garfield, J. (n.d.). The Illusion of Self [Audio clip]. Retrieved from https://dynamic.wakingup.com/clip/CL8DE7A-C9D3BB?code=SC0A33E39
• Oh, W. (2021). Understanding of Self: Buddhism and Psychoanalysis. Journal of Religion and Health. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-021-01437-w
• Heraclitus. (n.d.). In Wikiquote. Retrieved from https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Heraclitus
• Kegan, R. (2009). Immunity to Change: How to Overcome It and Unlock the Potential in Yourself and Your Organization. Harvard Business Press.