A young pastor asked me a great question once. He appeared to be doing a great job leading, but he wanted to do better. His question was this: “What are the worst leadership traits that you’ve seen limit a leader’s potential to lead well?”
That’s a hard question, because depending on the circumstances I think there could be many different answers. I wrote the “most dangerous” traits previously, but this question seemed different to me. It wasn’t addressing the dangerous traits, as much as the ones that were just bad. You can have these and perhaps still see some success as a leader, but they are still bad leadership traits – the worst. And they keep one from leading well. Eventually, they may derail a leader if not addressed.
There are many I’ve observed. I’ve seen laziness, for example, cripple a leader. With the right team around him or her, however, even a lazy leader can experience success. I thought of incompetence, but I have seen some dumb leaders (like me at times) smart enough to surround themselves with wise people.
So, what about the worst?
I’ve narrowed my list to the following 5 of the worst traits I’ve observed personally. Feel free to disagree or add to my list.
5 of the worst leadership traits I’ve observed:
Poor character – Nothing can overcome a flawed character. Dishonesty in a leader, for example, will always overshadow even the most worthy vision. You can’t hide a corrupt heart. Immorality always shines brighter than competence or ability. And it can be argued whether it should be called success, but I’ve seen some bad characters leading what appears to be very successful organizations.
Avoidance – The leader who ignores problems invites trouble to the church or organization. Problems never go away on their own. They fester and eventually explode. It may take a long time for them to be exposed but they will eventually catch up with the leader. Yet I have seen some leaders survive a long time while avoiding the real problems.
Indecisiveness – Every decision a leader makes is subject to opinion and there are always at least two. Most of the time many more. But leaders are called to make decisions when no one else can or will. Indecisiveness stalls progress and frustrates people. Yet I have talked with countless staff members of very large church who say their senior pastor can’t or won’t make decisions.
Control – Inflexibility on the part of a leader limits the church or organization to the level of performance solely by the leader. That’s always bad. Even if the person is a genius, there’s a lid placed upon the organization or church’s future. People feel squashed of their potential and under appreciated, producing half-heartedness and poor morale. Who needs that? But there are still growing organizations with controlling leaders. (Notice I didn’t say healthy, but growing).
Pride – Perhaps the worst trait I’ve personally observed is the arrogance of a leader. It turns people away in disgust when they hear a leader brag on all his or her accomplishments. The braggart feels good personally, but is never as popular as he or she perceives. I’ve found if a leader is really good at what they do, they won’t have to tell others about it. Yet, do you know any arrogant leaders who apparently lead “successful” organizations – even churches?
That’s my list. Again, these are all bad leadership traits, in my opinion and observation. Some will argue you couldn’t have these and lead successfully. That would depend, I suppose, on your definition of success, but regardless they are still bad traits. I would even say the worst.
Check out my leadership podcast where we discuss leadership nuggets in a practical way. Plus, check out the other Lifeway Leadership Podcasts.
Good list that we can take as warnings and for self-examination.
One of my pet peeves of poor leadership is laziness. This may overlap with avoidance, but it's a slightly different thing. Everyone is a salesman on one level or another and the first thing a salesmen sells is him- or her-self. I've seen too many leaders who aren't great leaders, but they are great salesmen. They talk a good game to their boss(es) and are great at covering a lack of results through the same salesmanship. Another aspect is using delegation to avoid taking responsibility for the work themselves. That in part allows them to distance themselves from the mistakes of their team and take credit for the successes of their team without actually doing much. That's a lazy misuse of delegation.