Remove 2005 Remove 2011 Remove Deming Remove Quality
article thumbnail

20 Most Popular Posts on the Curious Cat Management Blog in 2016

Curious Cat

The Purpose of an Organization (2005). One factor at a time (OFAT) Versus Factorial Designs (2011). The aim of leadership is not merely to find and record failures of men (2011) *. Deming and Software Development (2014) *. 6 posts were new to the top 20 list this year (posts from 2004, 2010, 2011, 2013 [2] and 2014).

Blog 53
article thumbnail

20 Most Popular Posts on the Curious Cat Management Blog in 2015

Curious Cat

The Purpose of an Organization (2005). One factor at a time (OFAT) Versus Factorial Designs (2011). Steve Jobs on Quality, Business and Joseph Juran (2014). My site is a tiny population and shouldn’t be used to make a judgement but it illustrates what is very common for sites with high quality content.

Blog 40
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

10 Most Popular Posts on the Curious Cat Management Blog in 2014

Curious Cat

The posts were published in 2010 (4 posts), 2013 (2), 2014 (2), 2005 (1) and 2012 (1). The Purpose of an Organization (2005). Steve Jobs on Quality, Business and Joseph Juran (2014). Deming and Software Development (2014). In the next 10 most popular posts 5 were from 2014 (2010 had 2 and 2008, 2009 and 2011 had 1 each).

Blog 40
article thumbnail

Applying Deming Principles at Small and Medium-sized Enterprises

Deming Institute

SMED your SME journey applying Deming principles – guest post by Luciana Paulise. My business would be to advise SME on how to be sustainable in the long term applying quality principles right from the very beginning. I applied for the Deming grant to learn more about him and be able to implement his teachings more accurately.

Deming 28
article thumbnail

The Best Companies Aren’t Afraid to Replace Their Most Profitable Products

Harvard Business Review

More than 40% of the unicorns that went public since 2011 saw their valuation stay flat or dropped. In 2005, when the demand for the iPod Mini remained huge, the Nano was launched, effectively destroying the revenue stream of an existing product. Back in 2009, there were just four companies that fit the bill.