Remove 2016 Remove Ethics Remove Media Remove Technology
article thumbnail

Marshall Goldsmith 15 Coaches Winners + Much More!

Marshall Goldsmith

Doug Winnie – ActionCOACH #1 small business coach 2016. Sanyin Siang – Executive Director Coach K Center on Leadership & Ethics (COLE), laboratory for leadership, Duke University’s Fuqua School of Business. Everett Alexander – Start up and family business coach, financial advisor and fund manager. Pooneh Mohajer – Inc.

article thumbnail

How to Think for Yourself When Algorithms Control What You Read

Harvard Business Review

Twitter replaced most-recent with most-important tweets when they introduced their algorithmic timeline in 2016. While data scientists, policymakers, and ethics boards work on large-scale, long-term fixes , it’s incumbent on us, as individual agents, to ensure that we find out and learn what we really need. What can be done?

How To 11
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

The Most (and Least) Empathetic Companies

Harvard Business Review

Businesses are more profitable and productive when they act ethically, treat their staff well, and communicate better with their customers, according to the latest Lady Geek Global Empathy Index. These qualities are increasingly important as social media feeds popular demand for transparency and authentic interaction. Technology.

article thumbnail

When AI Becomes the New Face of Your Brand

Harvard Business Review

Today some companies are taking brand anthropomorphism to a whole new level with sophisticated AI technologies. As brands assume more and more AI functionality, businesses must proactively manage any potential ethical and legal concerns. The implications are numerous. Beyond Chatbots. Indeed, Siri seems more persona than product.

Brand 8
article thumbnail

What HoloLens Has That Google Glass Didn’t

Harvard Business Review

They like technology, they have an Xbox, they have children, and they have an annual household income of more than $100,000. million consumers, or 45% of the people who bought a Kinect at launch who will try a HoloLens by 2016. Doesn’t this face the same ethics and social challenges as Glass?