Christensen Disruptive Innovation Engineering Finance 
N2Growth Blog
JUNE 14, 2010
While much has been written about corporate vision, mission, process, leadership, strategy, branding and a variety of other business practices, it is the engineering of these practices to be disruptive that maximizes opportunities. So why do so many established and often well managed companies struggle with disruptive innovation?
Harvard Business Review
SEPTEMBER 30, 2011
There are three founding partners : Clayton Christensen, Matt Christensen, and me. He's not only the controlling shareholder of Rose Park Advisors; our investment approach is based on his theory of disruptive innovation. When we meet with prospective investors, I don't speak much, and for good reason. But here's the rub.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
N2Growth Blog
JANUARY 13, 2011
Realistic : Adopting a new idea should be based upon solid business logic that drives corresponding financial engineering and modeling. Again, keep in mind that innovation and ideas are not one in the same. David Locke Innovation fails because of management, not the innovation.
Harvard Business Review
JUNE 21, 2017
We need to start treating innovation like other business disciplines — as a set of tools that are designed to accomplish specific objectives. It was with this in mind that I created the Innovation Matrix to help leaders identify the right type of strategy to solve a problem, by asking two questions: How well can we define the problem?
Harvard Business Review
OCTOBER 27, 2011
Listening to Amazon's finance chief Tom Szkutak explain the miss, it was immediately apparent that Amazon's problem was not with the top line. More recently, Christensen has acknowledged that perhaps Apple, the most valuable publicly traded company in the world, achieved the task. per share by nearly a dime.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
300 
Let's personalize your content