Remove Development Remove Management by Objectives Remove Objective Remove Technology
article thumbnail

Managing Remote Employees: Lessons Ancient Rome and Today

Great Leadership By Dan

Somehow the Romans were able to manage remote employees without all of the methods written about when ISOE was published in 1982, as well as Skype, texting, social media, IPhones, Sharepoint, WebEx, and a host of other technologies. Team development. Technology. Here are 10 timeless tips: 1. Agree on boundaries.

article thumbnail

Where are you on the management scale of newbie to expert hacker?

Ask Atma

They develop action plans. And the Fundaments of managing by objectives : Cascading of organizational goals and objectives, (For example, a top level goal of increasing sales by 20% over a defined period may require a bottom level goal of increasing marketing effectiveness or marketing coverage in order to reach the sales set.).

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Planning Doesn’t Have to Be the Enemy of Agile

Harvard Business Review

The capacity and willingness of managers to plan developed throughout the century. Management by Objectives (MBO) became the height of corporate fashion in the late 1950s. It seemed sensible, therefore, for executives to identify their objectives. Corporations developed large corporate units dedicated to it.

Agility 15
article thumbnail

How Overfocusing on Goals Can Hold Us Back

Harvard Business Review

First, you would probably define the robot’s objective: Find the exit of the maze. It’s geographically as close as possible to its objective but it can’t get there. Testing objective-less challenges in many other AI contexts, Stanley got similar results. ” Most modern managers take this as a given.

Goal 8
article thumbnail

Explain Your New Strategy By Emphasizing What It Isn’t

Harvard Business Review

Yet, according to Donald Sull’s research in the March issue of HBR, almost half of top executives cannot connect the dots between their company’s strategic priorities; and two out of three middle managers say they simply do not understand their strategic direction. As a result, most leaders score a C- in strategy comprehension.