EBM: Scientific Management

LDRLB

This post is part of a series called “Evidence-Based Management.” Scientific management (or Taylorism) is the first major theory of management. The core ideas of the theory were developed by Frederick Winslow Taylor in the 1880s and 1890s, and were first published in his monographs, Shop Management and The Principles of Scientific Management. However, Taylor’s effect on management thinking is undeniable.

Peter Drucker’s Recommendations for Summer Reading: Five Management Classics

First Friday Book Synopsis

Bob's blog entries Bloomberg Businessweek Drucker Institute at Claremont Graduate University Elton Mayo Federalist Papers firm and lasting foundations for principles of management Frederick Winslow Taylor Henri Fayol Industrial and General Administration Peter Drucker Peter Drucker’s Recommendations for Summer Reading: Five Management Classics Rick Wartzman The Human Problems of an Industrial Civilization The Principles of Scientific Management

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

The Legacy of F W Taylor - nobody wants to be called a manager?

Chartered Management Institute

The conference uses the occasion of the 100th anniversary of the publication of Frederick Winslow Taylor’s book Scientific Management , which is often credited with being the real beginning of the discipline of management as a discipline and an academic field. So if spending time in the Italian sunshine discussing the finer points of management theory with some top-notch academics appeals to you , a trip to Prato looks a good bet. F W Taylor nhs scientific management

Organizational Theory and Behavior – Walonick

Rapid BI

It represents the merger of scientific management, bureaucratic theory, and administrative theory. Management Contingency Theory Drucker Hawthorne Max Weber organizational Behavior Organizational growth organizational structure Organizational Theory systems theory TaylorismClassical organization theory evolved during the first half of this century. The post Organizational Theory and Behavior – Walonick appeared first on RapidBI.

Dehumanizing with AI, Automation, and Technical Optimization

The Practical Leader

In the early 1900s, Frederick Taylor, used “Scientific Management” principles to make the new production lines more efficient. Workers became cogs in the machine; shut off their minds, shut their mouths, and did what engineers and managers told them to do.

EBM: The Hawthorne Studies

LDRLB

Elton Mayo, a scientific management researcher, wanted to examine the impact of work conditions on employee productivity. Mayo’s findings challenged many assumptions of scientific management. These new ideas would lay the foundation for a whole new way of thinking about management. Leadership evidence-based management hawthorne mayo The Hawthorne Studies were conducted from 1927 to 1932 at the Hawthorne Works plant outside of Chicago.

Leading From Within: Shifting Ego, Ceding Control, and Rising Empathy

Great Leadership By Dan

The shift marks a significant move away from Henri Fayol's autocratic “command-and-control” type management theories and methodologies which have been in vogue since the early 1900s. These were coupled with Frederick Wilson Taylor’s popular scientific management theory that focused on financial compensation and the concept that workers’ motivation resulted from payment for volume-based repetitive task work.

Fayol 202

Book Review – The Mind at Work: Valuing the intelligence of the American Worker

Deming Institute

Frederick Taylor’s (1856-1915) Scientific Management depicted factory workers as uncouth lumps of clay to be shaped to fit industrial ends. Guest post by Michael Godfried: planner and policy analyst in Washington State. Mike Rose is a wonderful writer with a host of books to his name. The Mind at Work: Valuing the intelligence of the American Worker (2004) looks at the mental dimension of work that is often dismissed as mindless.

Tyranny of Metrics

Deming Institute

In America, the use of metrics can be tracked from Frederick Taylor’s Scientific Management (1911), the New Public Administration of the 1980s and the 2001 No Child Left Behind program and beyond. He saw increasing time and resources channeled to generating and managing metrics and drained away from more worthwhile efforts such as course development and mentoring. data management systems systems thinking Uncategorized understanding variation

Fueling Business Process Management with the Automation Engine that Can!

Strategy Driven

Organizations deploy automation technologies as the primary resource in their Business Process Management. Today’s C-level executives understand peripheral management of their critical applications, data systems, and shared services is not an effective, efficient, secure, or financially-feasible effort and require more robust, permanent solutions for assimilation into their BPM. You just finished reading Fueling Business Process Management with the Automation Engine that Can! !

The Big Picture of Business – Corporate Cultures Reflect Business Progress and Growth.

Strategy Driven

Organizations should coordinate management skills into its overall corporate strategy, in order to satisfy customer needs profitably, draw together the components for practical strategies and implement strategic requirements to impact the business. This is my review of how management styles have evolved. In the period that predated scientific management, the Captain of Industry style prevailed. The Human Relations style of management flourished from 1940-1964.

If You Want to Motivate Employees, Stop Trusting Your Instincts

Harvard Business

Few topics have received more attention in talent management than motivation, defined as the deliberate attempt to influence employees’ behaviors with the goal of enhancing their performance, and in turn their organizational effectiveness. However, while the science of motivation is robust and well-established , it is rarely applied to real-world management practices, which tend to be based on managers’ intuition and subjective experience.

It’s the Company’s Job to Help Employees Learn

Harvard Business

When Frederick Taylor published his pioneering principles of scientific management in 1912, the repetitive and mundane nature of most jobs required employees to think as little as possible. Breaking down each task into basic components and standardizing workers’ behaviors to eliminate choice and flexibility could help managers turn employees into productive machines, albeit with alienated spirits. Vincent Tsui for HBR.

Give Your Team the Freedom to Do the Work They Think Matters Most

Harvard Business

Since at least the time of Frederick Taylor, the father of “scientific management,” control has been central to corporate organization: Control of costs, of prices, of investment and—not least—of people. Moreover, it feels like what a manager should be doing: Setting targets, monitoring adherence to procedures, directing, shaping the future of the business. When a new project comes in, the manager does not devise a plan to complete it.

Forget Brand Preference – Win the Brand Relevance War

Strategy Driven

Defining and Managing the Category or Subcategory. Understanding and managing relevance can be the difference between winning by becoming isolated from competitors or being mired in a difficult market environment where differentiation is hard to achieve and often short-lived.” There are two ways to compete in existing markets – gaining brand preference and making competitors irrelevant. Brand Relevance.

Brand 54

Create a Strategy That Anticipates and Learns

Harvard Business

But maybe the thrill of accomplishment in these pockets is diverting senior managers’ attention from another, even more critical opportunity: Digital technologies are also rapidly changing how managers can acquire and assess the information they use to develop and execute on enterprise-wide strategy. This isn’t a retread of scientific management , nor is it an updated take on scenario planning.

SWOT 28

Can Lean Manufacturing Put an End to Sweatshops?

Harvard Business

Traditional mass manufacturing is based on principles of “Scientific Management” that date back to the 19th century. Managers hold virtually all decision-making authority. It secured support from suppliers, offered extensive training to factory management, and inspected production lines for adoption of the new management practices.

Business Does Not Need the Humanities — But Humans Do

Harvard Business

Drucker Forum 2018 This article is one in a series related to the 10th Global Peter Drucker Forum , with the theme “ Management. It is impossible to attend a management or technology conference these days without hearing some version of that call for more humanism in tech. Drawing on a lifetime in business—as an economist, oil executive, and management professor—the charismatic octogenarian cut a startling figure. beastfromeast/Getty Images.

Mayo 41

Create a Strategy That Anticipates and Learns

Harvard Business Review

But maybe the thrill of accomplishment in these pockets is diverting senior managers’ attention from another, even more critical opportunity: Digital technologies are also rapidly changing how managers can acquire and assess the information they use to develop and execute on enterprise-wide strategy. This isn’t a retread of scientific management , nor is it an updated take on scenario planning.

SWOT 10

How Collaboration Tools Can Improve Knowledge Work

Harvard Business Review

As we automate more and more routine work, generating ever greater volumes of digital data, managers are focusing ever more on supporting knowledge workers — which these days is just about everybody. Frederick Winslow Taylor , regarded as the father of scientific management and one of the first management consultants in the early 1900s, believed workers were incapable of dissecting and improving their jobs.

The Renaissance We Need in Business Education

Harvard Business Review

The Gordon-Howell Report in 1959, funded by the Ford Foundation, criticized the weak scientific foundation of business education, suggesting that professors were more like quacks than serious scholars. Perceiving a need for a more cerebral breed of managers to preside over corporations of unprecedented scale and scope, both looked for models to the research-driven natural science fields.

Stop Trying to Control People or Make Them Happy

Harvard Business Review

Whether you’ve heard of them or not, two gurus from the early 20 th century still dominate management thinking and practice — to our detriment. It has been more than 100 years since Frederick Taylor, an American engineer working in the steel business, published his seminal work on the principles of scientific management. Hence, the introduction of, say, a risk management team or a compliance unit or an innovation czar. Collaboration Managing people Productivity

Mayo 11

Don't Grieve for the Great A&P

Harvard Business Review

The first revolution came around the turn of the twentieth century, when the brothers took management roles in the tea-store chain run by their father, George H. This was the era of scientific management, when experts like Frederick Winslow Taylor kept busy measuring factory workers' every motion with the aim of improving productivity. John Hartford applied such scientific thinking to the grocery trade.

Why Management Ideas Matter

Harvard Business Review

Who is the most influential living management thinker? That is the question that the Thinkers50, the biennial global ranking of management thinkers , seeks to answer. But, celebrating the very best new thinking in management matters for three reasons. Second, management matters. It has become fashionable in some places to mock management. Managers are the fall guys, the scapegoats for organizational excesses, failures and inefficiencies.

Why Corporate Social Responsibility Doesn’t Work

Harvard Business Review

The same kinds of dynamics probably play out among lower-level managers too, Roussanov says in this Wharton video. Nikil Saval writes on Pacific Standard that life hacking''s popularity says something about How We Live Today – it wouldn’t be popular if it didn’t "tap into something deeply corroded about the way work has, without much resistance, managed to invade every corner of our lives."

Don’t Set Process Without Input from Frontline Workers

Harvard Business Review

Taylor , the founder of scientific management who died 100 years ago. Michael Power of the London School of Economics describes the resulting explosion of bureaucracy as “the risk management of everything.” If process management means cumbersome bureaucracy devised by distant experts, disaster awaits. Operations Operations management Business processes ArticleYou know those guys with the clipboards and checklists?

Managing in an Age of Winner-Take-All

Harvard Business Review

Over the last 250 years, waves upon waves of scientific and engineering advances have brought about an accelerating rise in living standards that even the two deadliest wars in history could not reverse. The advent of the modern organization and the practice of management constitutes a “social technology” that has been equally transformative. The forces of technology and management will continue to hold equal sway as the 21st century unfolds.

EPS 9

Five Good Reasons to Champion Auto-Analytics in Your Organization

Harvard Business Review

Below are five pointers to frame and guide the conversation for technology geeks and practitioners to champion the use of auto-analytics in their businesses: Auto-analytics can be understood within the tradition of scientific management. Management science has its roots in experimentation and productivity improvement. However, using personal data (emails, calendars, etc) and spreadsheets, some practitioners are developing personal yield management tools.

The Renaissance We Need in Business Education

Harvard Business Review

The Gordon-Howell Report in 1959, funded by the Ford Foundation, criticized the weak scientific foundation of business education, suggesting that professors were more like quacks than serious scholars. Perceiving a need for a more cerebral breed of managers to preside over corporations of unprecedented scale and scope, both looked for models to the research-rich natural science fields.

HBR Lives Where Taylorism Died

Harvard Business Review

Harvard Business Review editors go to work every day on articles they hope will make their mark on the history of management thinking. Coincidentally, the site where they go to work is itself of historical importance to management — because of a fight that is still alive today. What had been seen as a progressive, "scientific" approach was now cast as mechanical and demeaning. It's a familiar story with management ideas.

How IT Professionals Can Embrace the Serendipity Economy

Harvard Business Review

With Frederick''s Taylor invention of scientific management in the 1880s, and its subsequent assimilation into what we now consider modern management, organizations have used logic and rationality to the eliminate waste, to seek efficiency, and to transfer human knowledge to tools and processes. This perspective created the industrial economy lens through which most managers perceive their operations. The managers haven''t stopped talking to each other.

CTO 8